If you've been absent from class this past week, here's what you've been missing:
Tuesday: Melody (pgs. 13-17 in textbook)
Wednesday: Rhythm (pgs. 18-22)
Thursday: Harmony (pgs. 23-26)
Friday: A reading from "The Listening Book" and listening exercises using the musical terms learned in tuesday's/wednesday's/thursday's class.
You have also missed out on student performances on piano, violin, and viola.
Also, there was a fantastic noon convocation in the music building recital hall friday. I announced it to the classes this morning, and I saw that a few of you were there. Remember, one of these friday noon convocations counts as concert credit. Members of the music faculty performed, and it included: a brass quintet, a woodwind quintet, a baritone vocalist, a marimbist, a guitarist and singer performing Spanish songs, a jazz combo piece with scatting jazz vocalist, and a piano quartet playing a really cool Libby Larsen piece (in which they put on sunglasses in the middle of it--it was a very jazzy piece, using upright bass, violin, cello and piano. By the way, we will be studying Libby Larsen in a week or so, not only because she's a cool contemporary, living composer, but also because she's coming to our school in February to give a lecture, masterclass, and concert).
Speaking of concerts, the Spokane string quartet is giving a concert at the Met this Sunday, the 8th at 3pm. I'm not sure how much tickets cost, but you can look them up online (try googling "Spokane string quartet"). Tonight at the Opera House is "Brahms Blast" in which students receive free t-shirts (the t-shirts are sweet: there's a picture of a cannon on it blasting out musical notation. It made me laugh when I saw it)! On monday, Oct. 9 there is a pianist playing classical music at a church in Spokane--sorry I can't remember more details than that--but there are gold-colored flyers around the music building, so keep your eyes peeled. I will also try to remember to make an announcement on Monday.
IMPORTANT ISSUES BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION
I really appreciate receiving feedback from you, because it lets me know how I am doing. This is my first time teaching my own class, and need all the feedback I can get--positive or negative. You can post annonymous comments on this blog if you want to bring something to my attention if you don't feel comfortable emailing me. But I really do need to know what you think about your assignments, and class lectures and discussions, in case I end up teaching this class again here or elsewhere. One important comment brought to my attention was the fact that my lectures up until this point have seemed meandering, and the student wasn't sure what I expected of the class. This was a great comment, and I will attempt to answer that question so you all can get a sense of my teaching style, and also what I expect of you so that you will be able to pass this class.
YOU WILL PASS THIS CLASS IF:
--you turn in all of your journals and discussion sheets on time
--you show up for all three exams
--you come to class more than 3 times a week
--you turn in all four concert reports
YOU WILL FAIL THIS CLASS IF:
--you come to class 2 times a week
--you turn in less than 8 journals/or turn them in late
--you don't show up for exams
--you don't turn in concert reports
I'm certain most, if not all of you, will pass this class with flying colors. You need not know music theory or intensely memorize dates and facts. For every test I will hand out a review sheet at least three days in advance, and we will review material the day before the test. There is no need to worry. The tests will cover basic listening skills, such as being able to tell the difference between Stravinsky's music and Schoenberg's music; or Bach and Beethoven's music, etc. As we go through the class this quarter I will equip you with the skills you need to be able to do this. In fact, you could probably do it now with a little in-class listening. I will try to use examples from the CD's that come with your books so you can practice listening at home. The tests will also cover basic music history knowledge, and will either be in a multiple-choice or matching format. You will pass the tests if you come to class, and use the great resources that come with your books, including the CD-Rom, the listening CD's, and all the practice quizzes, composer biographies, etc. that can be found online (your book should have a link. If you can't find it, just google Norton's "Enjoyment of Music"). Please use these resources, especially if you tend to miss class a lot. I will not ask you music theory questions. I will not ask you anything that either hasn't been covered in class, or covered in the book.
As I said on the first day of class, my main objective for you is to develop your listening skills (in music as well as real life), and to develop an appreciation for music you may not have been exposed to before. Even if you don't develop an appreciation, I want you at least to think critically about why you like or dislike a piece of music. I want you to take away something valuable, something you can apply to real life--not just regurgitation of facts and dates, which you can all get from books----which leads me to my teaching philosophy.
Did any of you keep that handout I had you read the first week of class? It was for the listening exercise where I asked you to read an article, write a letter, and talk while I was playing music. That article was not accidental and random: it basically summarizes quite nicely my philosophy of education. It's written by an artist named Ben Shahn, from a book he wrote called, "The Shape of Content." It's the article that begins like this:
Attend a university if you possibly can. There is no content of knowledge that is not pertinent to the work you will want to do. But before you attend a university work at something for awhile. Do anything. Get a job in a potato field; or work as a grease-monkey in an auto repair shop. But if you do work in a field do not fail to observe the look and the feel of earth and of all things that you handle---yes, even potatoes!.....
Etc.
If you want a copy of this article I'd be happy to give you one. I love it because it's all about active learning---active vs. passive learning. Passive learning is what most of us are used to in college: going to class, listening to a professor give a lecture, and taking notes while the prof is lecturing. On the other hand, active learning is all about doing--not sitting and reading about something, or taking notes, but doing. If I told you how to run a cash register in a store, and gave you a book to read about it, it wouldn't be the same as actually standing in front of a cash register and ringing someone up. Does this make sense? I've tried to tailor my classes so that I give you some active experiences--playing and listening and writing about music, bringing in student performers to play for you, singing/dancing/clapping exercises, etc. I'm not interested in being a passive teacher or learner. I'm not intersted in delivering lectures that basically cover what you just read in the book (at least I hope you read). I will not cover every little detail in the book. That part is your responsibility. If you don't understand something you read, please tell me and I will try to make it more clear or illustrate it in class. Why would you even need a teacher who simply lectured from the book when you could just read this information in a book on your own time? Why take a class?
My job as a teacher is not to spout out facts, but to get you interested in the subject matter. If I see that you are coming to class, taking part in discussion, and doing your assignments with thoughtfulness, you will pass this class. That is all I ask. After the class is over you can decide to love or hate classical music or jazz, but at least consider it for the time being.
If you want to know more about me and my educational philosophy, read books by John Holt, Grace Llewellyn and John Taylor Gatto. I'm not just randomly thowing lectures together: I ponder deeply what I will bring to class everyday, and to be honest, it's consuming me right now. I spend a minimum of two hours everyday preparing for class--mostly because I'm new at this, but also because I want to format lectures that will be interesting, or at least amusing to you. I try to shake it up a bit by making each class a little different--by playing weird music that maybe you haven't heard before, by showing films, by reading passages from The Listening Book, by making you do silly Orff exercises (if you don't know about Orff music education, you should check out a book about it).
More about my educational background: My B.A. is in art education. That means I took art classes as well as education classes: developmental psych, general methods in education, current issues in education, etc. I went to a private women's college in St. Paul MN. I've been teaching private flute and piano lessons for 11 years. I have about six months classroom teaching experience, teaching elementary kids, junior-high school kids, and a few college teaching experiences where I subbed for a few classes last year. My deep interest and passion is education. I'm constantly thinking about what's wrong with education today and how I can help fix it.
Anyway, like I said at the beginning of this long-winded paragraph, I really need your feedback. Don't be afraid to tell me what's working and what isn't working. I realize that there are as many learning styles as there are people in the class, and it would be impossible for me to accomodate every learning style. It is your responsibility to tell me when you're confused by my lectures or something you read. I want to make this class as enjoyable and painless as possible.
TOPICS FOR THE WEEK OF OCT. 9
Starting this coming Monday, we will begin discussing the various periods in music history. We are starting with the Contemporary/20th Century period (which differs from other classes, which start with the Medieval period. If you want to know why we're doing this, you can ask me). On Monday we will discuss Stravinsky. The following days, we will discuss Schoenberg, and Cage, depending on how much we vary from the schedule. The last page of your syllabus gives you a general outline of the weeks to come. I will be as specific as possible about the weeks as they happen. It's hard to project readings/assignments into the future when you have a class that meets everyday.
So, we will slip into more of a routine starting monday, although don't be surprised by the unexpected (to keep you from falling asleep in class).
ASSIGNMENT FOR MONDAY OCT. 9
*Journal #3 due (ideal playlist, 10 songs. etc. See previous post).
*read pgs. 366-379 in textbook (Chapter 61-63: "Main Currents in Early-Twentieth Century Music," "New Elements of Musical Style," and "Stravinsky and the Revitalization of Rhythm.")
*As you're reading, write down 3 questions, comments or observations about the reading. You do not have to answer your own questions, like a discussion sheet. If something confuses you about the reading, write some questions down and I will try to answer them for you. This step is important, because, starting Monday, I WILL RANDOMLY DRAW NAMES FROM A HAT TO SHARE THEIR QUESTIONS/COMMENTS WITH THE CLASS.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to email me or put a comment on this blog.
Thanks for reading this very long post.